burg, town, village, city, metropolis, cro…

User since 2008
Posts: 15

23 Feb. 2008

Do any one be able to tell me de difference between ; burg, town, village, city, metropolis, crossroads, hamlet ?

The extremes for example crossroads and city couldnt be mistankely used but how to recognise a hamlet from a crossroads (Well, you could say if there is no road in the hamlet then is a hamlet)

Seriously the french dictionnary mixes quite easily them.

Is there any method to determine when the one ends and the other starts ?

Ben Fad

User since 2008
Posts: 1

27 Feb. 2008

From Vlirbo:
Do any one be able to tell me de difference between ; burg, town, village, city, metropolis, crossroads, hamlet ?

The extremes for example crossroads and city couldnt be mistankely used but how to recognise a hamlet from a crossroads (Well, you could say if there is no road in the hamlet then is a hamlet)

Seriously the french dictionnary mixes quite easily them.

Is there any method to determine when the one ends and the other starts ?

AhQ ['a: kiu]

User since 2006
Posts: 2715

27 Feb. 2008

That's it, Antonio. (Quite more charming your first name!)
You put up an unexpected criterion to the classification (at least unexpected to me), the tarmac.
You are not at a loss for ideas.

Thanks for answering!

CS: I think the streets may be covered WITH tarmac, just as the apron and the taxiways of an airport. In the same way, one might be covered WITH glory or WITH confusion.
[CW]

AhQ ['a: kiu]

User since 2006
Posts: 2715

24 Feb. 2008

Your notice is worth a follow-up, Vlirbo. Here is my thought. Itâ€™s nothing new, nothing that you wouldnâ€™t know yet. Though I think itâ€™s worth talking about it.

A language is not a program built up logically as to make a grid of cases for words that would not overlap. A language is a common system used by a people to communicate; it has been historically built up by itself and is constantly developing. Hence there are synonyms, i.e. words which bear more or less the same meaning, even though two synonyms never express exactly the same thing, be it by their writing and uttering which give the words different shapes and soundings, thus might call up different affects to the speaker/listener/writer/reader.
To get to know by what one of the words you cite differs from another, just make an enquiry about the words, their origin and particularly about idiomatic expressions in which they appear.

The burg comes from German and Dutch that were used to calling a burg a fortified castle. Since you would be wise using burg to point out a big settlement which is provided with ramparts or an old castle. I wouldnâ€™t call burg a new city recently emerged from nowhere.
The word town also comes from fortress in Old Irish but the word has been developing so much that for now a town is an aggregation of houses and buildings a bit less large than a city. You wonâ€™t say that London is a town; itâ€™s a city, even though it behaves an old quarter called the City with its own legendary mayor.
From your staying place in a hamlet you go downtown to Birmingham (a city). But the inhabitants of a small town are called citizens.

A village is a settlement usually larger that an hamlet and smaller than a town.
Would you split the domains of that three words according to the number of inhabitants, the number of buildings, the income of people, the surface of the area, the nature of the soil, and whatnot? Foolish!
I dwell in a village which boasts it is the smaller town in the world. But that is quite controversial because criteria donâ€™t exist.

To my mind metropolis and crossroads are a bit aside of the rest of the list.
As metropolis comes from Greek meter (mother) and polis (city), we generally call metropolis large cities that somehow seem to rule over a country, just like a mother-city takes care of a colony. A metropolis is necessarily the capital (or main city) of a region, a country, a state.

As you said, you wouldnâ€™t call crossroads a hamlet or any settlement which is not provided with crossroads, or at least, is not lying along a main road.

It would be quite interesting to list a number of sentences, idioms, quotations of authors or newspapers where the words you cited would come in a context.
To my mind, Vlirbo, those words donâ€™t share different proper areas where one starts just where another ends. They overlap each other, even though each word keeps its own character. That makes that a language is no

Your notice is worth a follow-up, Vlirbo. Here is my thought. Itâ€™s nothing new, nothing that you wouldnâ€™t know yet. Though I think itâ€™s worth talking about it.  
 
 
 A language is not a program built up logically as to make a grid of cases for words that would not overlap. A language is a common system used by a people to communicate; it has been historically built up by itself and is constantly developing. Hence there are synonyms, i.e. words which bear more or less the same meaning, even though two synonyms never express exactly the same thing, be it by their writing and uttering which give the words different shapes and soundings, thus might call up different affects to the speaker/listener/writer/reader. 
 To get to know by what one of the words you cite differs from another, just make an enquiry about the words, their origin and particularly about idiomatic expressions in which they appear.  
 
 
 The burg comes from German and Dutch that were used to calling a burg a fortified castle. Since you would be wise using burg to point out a big settlement which is provided with ramparts or an old castle. I wouldnâ€™t call burg a new city recently emerged from nowhere. 
 The word town also comes from fortress in Old Irish but the word has been developing so much that for now a town is an aggregation of houses and buildings a bit less large than a city. You wonâ€™t say that London is a town; itâ€™s a city, even though it behaves an old quarter called the City with its own legendary mayor. 
 From your staying place in a hamlet you go downtown to Birmingham (a city). But the inhabitants of a small town are called citizens.  
 
 
 A village is a settlement usually larger that an hamlet and smaller than a town. 
 Would you split the domains of that three words according to the number of inhabitants, the number of buildings, the income of people, the surface of the area, the nature of the soil, and whatnot? Foolish! 
 I dwell in a village which boasts it is the smaller town in the world. But that is quite controversial because criteria donâ€™t exist.  
 
 
 To my mind metropolis and crossroads are a bit aside of the rest of the list. 
 As metropolis comes from Greek meter (mother) and polis (city), we generally call metropolis large cities that somehow seem to rule over a country, just like a mother-city takes care of a colony. A metropolis is necessarily the capital (or main city) of a region, a country, a state.  
 
 
 As you said, you wouldnâ€™t call crossroads a hamlet or any settlement which is not provided with crossroads, or at least, is not lying along a main road.  
 
 
 It would be quite interesting to list a number of sentences, idioms, quotations of authors or newspapers where the words you cited would come in a context. 
 To my mind, Vlirbo, those words donâ€™t share different proper areas where one starts just where another ends. They overlap each other, even though each word keeps its own character. That makes that a language is no

burg, town, village, city, metropolis, crossroads, hamlet

4 comments

New comment